ALRAY SINGLETON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was found guilty by a jury of robbery, was adjudged in accordance with the verdict and sentenced to ten years in prison. On this appeal the only substantial point argued is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motions for judgment of acquittal.
Appellant argues that he was entitled to acquittal because of the two eye witnesses, one who identified him and the other who stated that he was not the robber. The judgment and sentence are affirmed upon the authority of the rule stated in State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So. 2d 893; see also Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 517 and Gilbert v. State, Fla.App.1975, 311 So. 2d 384.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
I.R. and I.R. v. State, 385 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…ppellant handed his brother the metal lock just before the brother struck the fatal bow.2 The testimony of a single witness, even if uncorroborated and contradicted by other State witnesses, is sufficient to sustain a conviction. Singleton v. State, 315 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Bruton v. State, 220 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). Affirmed. . Had the court in Majors held that the evidence was insufficient to prove Majors’ guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, Majors would have been entitled to the entry of a…
-
Jackson v. State, 636 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…uing the search warrant against Jackson’s automobile, without regard to the good faith exception of Leon. Garcia, 547 So. 2d at 630. After excluding from the affidavit the information derived from the duplicate display pager, see State v. Alphonse, 315 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), we conclude that the remaining facts are insufficient to establish probable cause. The last incident supporting a probable cause determination occurred approximately six and one-half months prior to the issuance of the warrant.…
-
Brookins v. State, 343 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…ut a surveillance in front of the appellant’s residence at the time of the sale. Based on the record before us, we find that the appellant’s arguments are without merit. See State v. Sebastian, 171 So. 2d 893 (Fla.1965). See also Singleton v. State, 315 So. 2d 506 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Dilberth v. State, 267 So. 2d 661 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); and Hargrett v. State, 255 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Affirmed.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Sebastian, 171 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 1965)
- Taylor v. State, 199 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
- Gilbert v. State, 311 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)