ELIZABETH JANE STEWART THOMPSON, PETITIONER,

v.

R. CLARK THOMPSON, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1978)
  …mporaneous objection rule, an objection must be sufficiently specific both to apprise the trial judge of the putative error and to preserve the issue for intelligent review on appeal. See Rivers v. State, 307 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert, denied, 316 So. 2d 285 (Fla.1975); York v. State, 232 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). These considerations compel us to conclude that in re-instruction cases like the present one, objections must be explicit. They must direct the attention of the trial judge to the purpo…
• Lou Ann Andreasen v. State, 439 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …eft under section 812.014(2)(b)l, it was only necessary that the state prove that the property stolen had a value in excess of $100. Nelson v. State, 127 Fla. 677, 173 So. 841 (Fla.1937); Rivers v. State, 307 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA); cert. denied, 316 So. 2d 285 (Fla.1975). The sole remaining inquiry, and the most critical one, is whether or not the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the defendant who was responsible for the theft. If the state failed to meet its burden of proving this n…
• Scurry v. State, 506 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
  …truction. After review of the colloquy, we find that defense counsel’s request was sufficiently specific to constitute a timely objection. See Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1978); Rivers v. State, 307 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 316 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 1975). However, we find that the evidence adduced in this case falls short of section 782.04(2), Florida Statutes (1983).1 Therefore, the trial judge correctly refused to give the instruction. Affirmed. DANAHY, C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., and B…

Authorities Cited

• Callas v. Despina Callas & Travelers Ins. Co., 306 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
• Troupe v. Duval Cnty. Hosp. Auth., 306 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)