DON W. SHEFFIELD, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Lackore, 408 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 1982)
  …[*1042] plicable law. A close examination of the precedents, however, refutes this argument and reveals that the district court was correct. Our analysis begins with Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. Johnson, 307 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 316 So. 2d 290 (Fla.1975), where the district court allowed the insurer to set off the amount of personal injury protection benefits the insured had received for loss of earnings and medical expenses. The court explained that the insured’s demand for arbitration f…
• Masters v. Latona Lester, 366 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …Evans v. Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., 355 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Moreno, 350 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) and Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. Johnson, 307 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. denied 316 So. 2d 290 (Fla.1975). Accordingly, the judgment sought to be reviewed is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for entry of a judgment consistent herewith. McCORD, C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur. . This part of the decision below is not before us on appeal.…
• Lackore v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 390 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
  …to prove that she has sustained other damages up to the amount of her uninsured motorist coverage limits.2 There should be no automatic reduction such as was ordered herein. In Stuyvesant v. Johnson, 307 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. denied 316 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1975), we held that an insured could not recover the same benefits under both his personal injury protection coverage and uninsured motorist coverage, but we also stated: It should be noted that the statute makes the UMI coverage excess, thus…

Authorities Cited

• Sheffield v. State, 309 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
• Lovie Lee Owens v. State, 309 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)