JIMMIE MITCHELL WILLIAMS AND PAUL EVERETT KELLY, JR., APPELLANTS,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Cain & Bultman, Inc. v. Miss SAM, Inc., 409 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
  …ntained in the Miller-Ackley agreement for deed. . The tax aspects of the vendor’s security (lien) rights are considered in Jasper v. Orange Lake Homes Inc., 151 So. 2d 331 (Fla.2d DCA), cert. denied, 155 So. 2d 694 (Fla.1963). . Hoffman v. Semet, 316 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). . Latin-American Bank v. Rogers, 87 Fla. 147, 99 So. 546, 547 (1924), holds that the interest of a titleholder who has entered into an agreement for deed is subject to levy under execution on a judgment. Of course, anyone acqui…
• Ahmad Saidi v. Wasko, 687 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …cate of title, appear to refer to the right of redemption. A mortgagor’s equity of redemption is considered to be an estate in land. John Stepp v. First Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n. of Miami, 379 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Hoffman v. Semet, 316 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). To “foreclose” is defined as “to shut out, to bar, to terminate. Method of terminating mortgagor’s right of redemption.” Blacks Law Dictionary 581 (5th ed. 1979). Giving the words used in paragraph eight their common and ordinar…
• First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Fort Myers v. FOX, 440 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …ement for deed is essentially a security interest which takes the place of the more traditional purchase money mortgage, the vendee has an equity of redemption in the property. Adkinson v. Nyberg, 344 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Hoffman v. Semet, 316 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). The vendor under an agreement for deed transfers all of his interest in the property except for bare legal title. Cain & Bultman, Inc. v. Miss Sam, Inc., 409 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). The legal effect of this transaction…