DOLPHIN TRUCK LEASING, INC., AND H. E. MATHEWS, APPELLANTS,
v.
GERALD R. PERRY ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1975-07-22
No. 74-1448
Before BARKDULL, C. J„ and PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ.
317 So. 2d 122 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1975)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court improperly dismissed counts of the complaint seeking a declaratory judgment without leave to amend.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment construing a contract provision regarding cancellation. The trial court dismissed the complaint, finding the c…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents for review the court’s order dismissing two counts of a complaint1 which sought a declaratory judgment and other relief. The complaint asks the court’s construction of a paragraph reading as follows:

“Seller further acknowledges and agrees that this transaction may be can-celled ... in the event Buyer is unable to make satisfactory arrangements with General Motors Acceptance Corporation and the Chevrolet Division of General Motors Corporation for the continuation of the business and operations of the corporation. . . ”

The trial court dismissed the complaint upon a holding that the contract clearly gave the buyer only the option of cancelling the contract. Our reading of the complete contract and the complaint convinces us that it does not appear without dispute that the contract is unambiguous. Plaintiff should have an opportunity to present facts establishing the intent of the parties if he is able to do so. See Holmes v. Kilgore, 1925, 89 Fla. 194, 103 So. 825.

We do not mean to preclude any allowable procedure under the rules by either party in this suit. The extent of our holding is that the two counts were improperly dismissed without leave to amend.

Reversed and remanded.

. See Mendez v. West Flagler Family Association, Fla.1974, 303 So. 2d 1.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw