JOHN H. PADGETT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
JOHN H. PADGETT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
102 Fla. 542
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 135 So. 858
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Bueord, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gardiner v. Goertner, 110 Fla. 377 (Fla. 1932)…ramer v. Eichelberger, 96 Fla. 683, 118 So. 737; Shipley-Young Co. v. Young, 97 Fla. 46, 119 So. 522; Weaver-Loughridge Lbr. Co. v., Kirkland, 99 Fla. 426, 131 So. 784; Hancoy Holding Co. v. Lambright, 101 Fla. 128, 133 So. 631; Turnipseed v. Brown, 102 Fla. 542; 136 So. 343 and other Florida cases. Taking into consideration the age and physical condition of testator, the fact that he was a very sick man at the time of the execution of the will, and the evidence showing the circumstances connected with its…
-
Maxwell v. Smith, 119 Fla. 389 (Fla. 1935)…Inv. Co., 73 Fla. 191, 74 South. Rep. 216, 1 A. L. R. 25; Smith v. O'Brien, 75 Fla. 252, 78 South. Rep. 13; Coogan v. Burley, 92 Fla. 899, 110 South. Rep. 529; Woodruff v. Lantana Finance Corp. 102 Fla. 950, 136 South. Rep. 712; Turnipseed v. Brown, 102 Fla. 542, 136 South. Rep. 343. The method used by the complainant to exact from the defendants a sum of money amounting to a compensation greater than ten per cent, per annum upon the sum actually loaned was a scheme, device or contrivance whereby the inhib…
-
McEwen v. Growers Loan & Guar. Co., 104 Fla. 176 (Fla. 1932)…re is conflict in the testimony. In such case the chancellor’s findings and decree will not be reversed. See Lewter v. Price, 25 Fla. 574, 6 South. Rep. 439; Rosenthal v. First Nat. Fire Ins. Co., 74 Fla. 371, 77 South. Rep. 92; Turnipseed v. Brown, 102 Fla. 542, 136 South. Rep. 343; Lesnoff v. Becker, 101 Fla. 716, 135 South. Rep. 146. The chancellor’s findings therefore that the note for ten thousand dollars was a subsisting valid and unpaid debt except that part which was admitted to' have been paid and…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence