LYNN M. SHAW AND FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, APPELLANTS,

v.

JULIUS JAY PERLMUTTER, JR., AND JULIUS JAY PERLMUTTER ASSOCIATES, INC., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Leonard v. Susco CAR Rental Sys. OF Fla., Inc., 103 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)
  …s not held liable because it affirmatively [*246] appeared that the operation of the truck was without the owner’s consent. The emphasis upon consent as an element necessary for liability was again illustrated in Sykes v. Babijuice Corp., Fla.1953, 63 So. 2d 65. There the Court held an owner was not liable where a night watchman without permission, expressed or implied, took one of defendant’s trucks from the premises on a personal mission. However where consent has been given and the agent has exceeded h…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Elmore Ivey v. Nat'l Fisheries, Inc., 215 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
  …wherein the employer’s permission to use the vehicle extended only to the immediate business premises and the tort occurred outside this boundary. Therefore, that fact served to preclude the employer’s liability. Sykes v. Babijuice Corp., Fla.1953, 63 So. 2d 65; Keller v. Florida Power & Light Co., Fla. App.1963, 156 So. 2d 775. But, once it has been established that the employee has the employer’s authorization to use the auto, the policy of the law has favored the imposition of liability upon the employ…
• Commercial Carrier Corp. v. S. J. G. Corp., 409 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
  …duty in negligence may exist if a criminal act is sufficiently foreseeable that a reasonable man would realize that the criminal act in conjunction with the person’s negligence will result in a loss. On the other hand, in Sykes v. Babijuice Corp., 63 So. 2d 65 (Fla.1953), the corporate owner was held not liable for damages arising out of the use on the highway of one of its trucks by the night watchman, who had been expressly instructed not to drive the company’s trucks off the premises. The court noted t…