BOCA RATON CLUB, ETC., ET AL.
v.
DUFF ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from a workmen's compensation case because the notice of appeal was not filed within the time period prescribed by the Workmen's Compensation Act. The Court also denied the appellants' alternative petition for a writ of certiorari.
The appellants' appeal was not timely filed under the Workmen's Compensation Act, and therefore the motion to dismiss the appeal was granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari was also denied.
“The appellants filed a notice of appeal from an order of the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida, entered on appeal from an order of the Florida Industrial Commission in a workman's compensation case.”
Establishes the procedural posture and context of the case as a workmen's compensation appeal.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellants sought to appeal an order of the Circuit Court in Dade County, which itself was an appeal from an order of the Florida Industrial Commissio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Timeliness Of Notice Of Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
ROBERTS, Justice.
The appellants filed a notice of appeal from an order of the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida, entered on appeal from an order of the Florida Industrial Commission in a workman’s compensation case. The appellees have moved this court to dismiss such appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was not filed within the time prescribed by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Section 440.27, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., nor in accordance with other requirements of such Act. Subsequent to the filing of such motion to dismiss the appeal, the appellants filed in this court a petition for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Circuit Court. We here consider the appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal and the appellants’ petition for a writ of certiorari.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted under the authority of Smith v. Fletcher Motor Sales, Inc., Fla. 62 So. 2d 60.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied under the authority of Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co. v. Coleman, 139 Fla. 823, 191 So. 16; South Atlantic Steamship Co. v. Tutson, 139 Fla. 405, 190 So. 675; and Stansell v. Marlin, 153 Fla. 421, 14 So. 2d 892.
It is so ordered.
SEBRING, Acting Chief Justice, and MATHEWS, J., and FABISINSKI, Associate Justice, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- S. Atl. S.S. Co. of Del. v. Sumpter Tutson and Katie May Tutson, 139 Fla. 405 (Fla. 1939)
- Stansell v. MRS. Lucile Minish Marlin, 153 Fla. 421 (Fla. 1943)
- E. E. W. Est., Inc. v. Columbia Cas. Co., 153 Fla. 421 (Fla. 1943)
- Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co. & Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co. v. Isabella Coleman and Florida Coleman, 139 Fla. 823 (Fla. 1939)
- Smith v. Fletcher Motor Sales, Inc., 62 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 1952)