THE FLORIDA BAR, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES J. TAYLOR, JR., RESPONDENT
The Florida Bar having filed on July 1, 1975, Petition for Suspension showing that James J. Taylor, Jr., a/k/a James Johnson Taylor has been convicted of a felony in a federal court and having accompanied said notice by proper proof of service and the above-named attorney having failed to file a petition with the Court requesting modification or termination of the suspension, James J. Taylor, Jr., a/k/a James Johnson Taylor, is hereby suspended from The Florida Bar pursuant to Article XI, Rule 11.07, of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar as of September 11, 1975.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chicken'n'things & Ins. Co. of N. Am. v. Martha Murray & the Fla. Dep't of Commerce, 329 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 1976)…ADKINS, Justice (concurring). I concur in the opinion of the majority for the reasons stated therein and in my concurring opinion in Hughes v. Public Finance Service, Inc., 319 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1975). While the principal issue in Hughes was whether an appellate court departs from the essential requirements of law when it reverses a lower court’s judgment which is supported by competent, substantial evidence, I stated there that the I…
-
Walt Disney World Co. v. Harrison, 443 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…aled the sufficiency of the claim. In the absence of demonstrated prejudice to Disney, claimant's attendant care benefits should be paid from February 12,1982, even though not formally requested until March 1. Hughes v. Public Finance Service, Inc., 319 So. 2d 18 (Fla.1975). We vacate the amount of benefits and remand for redetermination of the proper amount due consistent with this opinion. Appellee concedes, and we agree, that no penalties should be assessed on this redetermined amount. In all other respe…
-
Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Auth. v. Cormio, 388 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)…n orders of the Industrial Relations Commission, and those of judges of industrial claims, too, as “quasi-judicial”, not administrative, indeed “more judicial than quasi-judicial”. LeLoup, supra, 307 So. 2d at 171; Hughes v. Public Fin. Serv., Inc., 319 So. 2d 18 (Fla.1975); In re Workmen’s Compensation Rules of Procedure, 343 So. 2d 1273 (Fla.1977). See also Myers v. Hawkins, 362 So. 2d 926, 931 n. 15, 932 (Fla.1978). LeLoup specifically held workmen’s compensation orders are not “administrative action” wit…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence