FLORIDA STEEL CORPORATION, APPELLANT, PETITIONER,

v.

FRED O. DICKINSON, JR., ET AL., APPELLEES, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Penelope Hessen v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 513 So. 2d 1330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …s of the potential class.” We disagree and reverse. First, there is no showing that the appellant’s claim is, or could be antagonistic to that of other members of the class. See Paulino v. Hardister, 306 So. 2d 125 (Pla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 319 So. 2d 30 (Pla.1975). Second, because the issue is simply whether the redemption notice was adequate, the material issues of fact and law are common and the claim of the appellant is typical to all members of the class; thus there would be no need for severa…
• State v. Critzer, 381 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …y Notices to Appear is given a special section in the Rules of Criminal Procedure,1 as is prosecution in county court for violation of ordinances by affidavit or docket entries. See McElroy v. Brown, 311 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. denied, 319 So. 2d 30 (Fla.1975). Moreover, Rule 3.125(g) specifically lists what, is required to appear in a valid notice to appear. The Notice' to Appear sub judice named the offense, the statute number, and included a narrative which was sufficiently detailed to enabl…

Authorities Cited

• Fla. Steel Corp. v. Dickinson, 308 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)