STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, PETITIONER,
v.
STEPHEN A. HENDERSON AND THE CAREER SERVICE COMMISSION OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner has filed an instrument entitled “Motion for Leave to File Extraordinary Petition for Rehearing” stating therein that the “. . . decisions in Henderson and Crumbie, while coming so close in time, are so incompatible in result as to suggest a mistake or oversight exists and Petitioner respectfully so requests to the Court.”
This Court rendered its opinion denying certiorari in the instant (Henderson) case on December 12, 1974. Petitioner did not see fit to file a petition for rehearing. The instant motion, being filed some seventy-six (76) days after our opinion was rendered, is not cognizable by this Court, and same is hereby denied.
RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Simms v. State, 641 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…1150. The authority of HRS to protect children stems either from its enabling act, in chapter 409, Florida Statutes (1991), see § 409.145, or a court order divesting the court’s exclusively original jurisdiction. Division of Family Servs. v. State, 319 So. 2d 72, 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Indeed, a number of Florida statutes delegate overlapping and concurrent power over matters relating to child custody and commitment proceedings to both HRS and to the circuit courts. Hollis, 439 So. 2d at 948; see, e.g., §…
-
State v. The Honorable Alban Brooke of the Cir. Court of the Fourth Jud. Cir. In & For Duval Cnty., 573 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…it was held that the trial court did not infringe on the Department’s power as it did not order the Department to place the subject children in any particular foster care facility; In restating its reasoning in Division of Family Services v. State, 319 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), this court emphasized that the broad grant of discretion given the Department in placing the child or children committed to its custody is neither “unfettered” nor is the Department permitted to “flaunt [or] ignore specific prov…
-
Peck Plaza Condo. v. Div. OF Fla. Land Sales & Condos., 371 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)…ions and officers have no common-law powers; but are limited to such powers as may be granted, either expressly or by necessary or fair implication, by the statutes creating them. . . ” Also, this Court held in Division of Family Services v. State, 319 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975): “It is a generally accepted principle of administrative law that an agency, being a creature of statute, has only those powers given to it by the legislature. . . ” There being no statutory grant of power to the Division to in…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence