DANIEL R. MCLEAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

Fla. 1st DCA | 1975-10-07
No. X-146
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.
319 So. 2d 133 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs of counsel and find no excess of jurisdiction by the trial court and no departure from the essential requirements of law.

Certiorari denied.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Doerr v. State, 348 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
    …mstances surrounding the confession. Courts are rightfully solicitous of the procedural due process rights of juveniles. Moreover, the courts have been scrupulous in preserving parental prerogatives over their children. See, e. g., L.C.L. v. State, 319 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), wherein this court reversed a trial judge’s transfer of a juvenile case to the criminal division of the circuit court because of the court’s failure to notify the juvenile’s parents of the waiver hearing held under Section 39.09(…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw