HARRY SIEGEL AND BILLIE SIEGEL, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
LIONET H. SANGER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1975-09-11
No. 75-707
320 So. 2d 57 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mrs. Stanley (Joyce) Goldberg v. State, 351 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1977)
    …ed that he was testifying falsely, thereby prejudicing the State, and, in at least one area serving his own interest to the detriment of the defendant. The trial court refused the request. The Third District Court denied certiorari. State v. Harris, 320 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). The State then dismissed the information against Harris. In the instant case, the State again moved that MacLean be declared a court’s witness, and again the request was denied. Prior to trial, defense counsel requested the Stat…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw