LEE COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, PETITIONER,
v.
FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
LEE COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, PETITIONER,
FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
320 So. 2d 395
Florida Supreme Court (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Cause dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mathieson v. Gen. Motors Corp., 529 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…n of fact, that conclusion appears here to be so elemental as to constitute a permissible pleading. See H. Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure § 6-6 (1987) (citing Panama Realty, Inc. v. Robinson, 305 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. denied, 320 So. 2d 395 (Fla.1975)). As to the count for breach of express warranty, from the con-clusory allegation it appears that a cause of action can be stated and the complaint cured by amendment. The trial court, therefore, abused its discretion in dismissing the co…
-
Solomon v. Betras Plastics, Inc., 550 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)…a contract was executed, the agent will be legally responsible for the contract debt. Van D. Costas, Inc. v. Rosenberg, 432 So. 2d 656, 658-659 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Panama Realty, Inc. v. Robison, 305 So. 2d 34, 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. denied, 320 So. 2d 395 (Fla.1975). Furthermore, where a contract creditor is a corporation, the corporation is charged with notice of all transactions involving those through whom it does business. The failure of employees within a corporation to advise one another regard…