JEFFREY A. POPPENS, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, NATALIE V. POPPENS, AND NATALIE V. POPPENS, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PINELLAS COUNTY AND AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEES
JEFFREY A. POPPENS, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, NATALIE V. POPPENS, AND NATALIE V. POPPENS, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PINELLAS COUNTY AND AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEES
320 So. 2d 501
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. & Ins. Co. of N. Am. v. Eustace J. Matherne, 348 F.2d 394 (5th Cir. 1965)…al Practice, 2d ed. ¶ 50.02, p. 2316; 2B Barron & Holtzoff Federal Practice & Procedure, § 1075, p. 378. . Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. Breslin, 5 Cir. 1964, 332 F. 2d 928, 933. . McCandless v. Southern Bell T. & T. Co., 1960, 239 La. 983, 320 So. 2d 501; D. & D. Planting Co. v. Employers Casualty Co., 1960, 240 La. 684, 124 So. 2d 908. . Compare Norfolk & Dedham Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., La. App. 1960, 125 So. 2d 175. . See Prosser on Torts, p. 286. . 2 Wigmore, Evidence § 4…