WILLIAM CHARLES WINDHURST, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1975-10-03
No. 74-1477
CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
320 So. 2d 870 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1975) Negative Treatment
Cited by 28 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Our consideration of the briefs and record convinces us that the appellate points posed for our consideration are without merit. See Richter v. State, 1969, 1 Tenn. Cr.App. 270, 438 S.W. 2d 362, 364, and authorities cited therein.

We note however that the final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of the crime of receiving stolen property fails to recite knowledge on the defendant’s part of the stolen character of the property. Spurlock v. State, Fla.App.1973, 281 So. 2d 586.

Accordingly, the case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for entry of a proper judgment.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (14 total)

  • Cnty. Nat'l Bank OF N. Miami Beach v. Sheridan, Inc., 403 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
    …re always consistent with sound decision making in this area. Initially, we must review the trial court’s action to determine if the appropriate standard for determining motions to vacate default judgments was followed. In Clark v. Roberto’s, Inc., 320 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), we held that a defendant is entitled to relief from a default if he can demonstrate that his neglect to respond was excusable and that he had a meritorious defense: It has long been the policy of the courts in this state to lib…
  • Associated Med. Insts., Inc. v. Imperatori, 338 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
    …nt demonstrates that his neglect was excusable and he has a meritorious defense, a court will set aside the default for failure to file a responsive pleading so as to permit a determination of the controversy on the merits. Clark v. Roberto’s, Inc., 320 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975) and cases cited therein. We find that the misfiling of the complaint and summons constitutes excusable neglect. See North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So. 2d 849, 853 (Fla.1962). Initially the motion to vacate default me…
  • …v. Hecht, 189 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). The purpose of Rule 1.500, Fla.R.Civ.P., is to speed the cause along and prevent dilatory tactics. North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So. 2d 849 (Fla.1962). As we said in Clark v. Roberto’s, Inc., 320 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975): “It has long been the policy of the courts in this state to liberally set aside defaults for failure of a defendant to plead so as to allow a determination of the controversy on the merits when the defendant demonstrates that h…

Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw