J. HAROLD KLOCK AND MARGARET LOUISE KLOCK, HIS WIFE, AND HENRY J. BIOSCA AND MINNIE BIOSCA, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,

v.

MIAMI BEACH HEIGHTS, INC., AND WASHINGTON PROPERTIES, INC., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• White v. Fletcher, 90 So. 2d 129 (Fla. 1956)
  …in which he stated that there was no material issue of fact and that the case should be decided by the court alone. The effect of this motion was to waive his right to jury trial, had such right still been available to him. Dezen v. Slatcoff, Fla., 65 So. 2d 484. For the reasons stated herein the judgment appealed from is affirmed. DREW, C. J., and THOMAS and ROBERTS, JJ,, concur.…
• Coggan v. Coggan, 183 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
  …to be a judgment for a sum certain which would itself bear interest under Sec. 55.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Under such concept this would award compound interest on the sum awarded in the prior decree, which may not be done. Dezen v. Slatcoff, Fla.1953, 65 So. 2d 484; Deno v. Smith, 1931, 103 Fla. 282, 137 So. 248, 140 So. 335. However, in substance the order is nothing more than a declaration that statutory interest on the original award had accumulated to that date in the sum mentioned. As it is substarice and…
• Dade Cnty. v. Am. Re-Insurance Co., 467 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …premium paid, [Dade] shall pay the difference to [American], subject to the maximum retrospective premium for the period.” . The interest which is allowed is simple interest only; interest compounded annually is not allowed. See Dezen v. Slatcoff, 65 So. 2d 484 (Fla.1953); Deno v. Smith, 103 Fla. 282, 140 So. 335 (1931)(on petition for rehearing).…