THOMAS JOSEPH SMART, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
THOMAS JOSEPH SMART, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
321 So. 2d 446
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See: Milligan v. State, Fla. App.1965, 177 So. 2d 75; Arnold v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 265 So. 2d 64; compare State v. Cochran, Fla.1961, 126 So. 2d 883; § 925.07(1), Fla.Stat. (1973).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Steinhauer v. Steinhauer, 336 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)…in the record on appeal a transcript of testimony heard by the trial judge. The record as presented is too sparse to afford a basis for any disturbance of the chancellor’s findings, which we receive with a presumption of correctness. Ledee v. Ledee, 321 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). It is the responsibility of an appellant to provide the appellate court with an adequate record of the evidence and proceedings below which are essential to a just determination of the issues. Stearns v. City of Titusville, 246…
Authorities Cited
- Milligan v. State, 177 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Arnold v. State, 265 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- State ex rel. Fred M. FOX v. Cochran, 126 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 1961)