STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

IN THE INTEREST OF M. D. B., A CHILD, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Peek v. State, 395 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 1980)
  …on and the inability of the state to establish that the fingerprints were placed in the automobile at the time the crime was committed. State v. Hayes, 333 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Williams v. State, 308 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied 321 So. 2d 555 (Fla.1975); Wilkerson v. State, 232 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). Appellant explained the presence of his fingerprints in the automobile and that they were placed there the morning after the crime. This testimony was discredited by testimony of Off…
• Walker v. State, 656 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …re found does not give rise to the reasonableness of prior access; and that the defendant had no authorization to be on the premises” was sufficient to overcome a motion to dismiss. In Williams v. State, 308 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 321 So. 2d 555 (Fla.1975), the court, based on the facts of that ease, refused to distinguish between fingerprints found at a public versus a private location on the premises and instead adopted “the reasonableness of prior access” standard. Even so, the unauthori…
• C.A.S. v. State, 467 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …urglary even without her son’s testimony that he had not unauthorizedly asked the respondent inside. See Sorey v. State, 419 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) and cases cited; compare, Williams v. State, 308 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert, denied, 321 So. 2d 555 (Fla.1975) (fingerprint and husband’s testimony insufficient when defendant testified to his previously being in home in wife’s presence and wife did not testify). Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

• Clark Johnston v. Dean, 311 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)