THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE L. MOXON ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Appellant The United States of America seeks reversal of a final judgment entered in a suit for declaratory decree wherein the trial court determined priorities to a fund in the possession of appellee, Moxon.
The final judgment recites that it is based upon a consideration by the court of “all of the pleadings, papers and evidence . ” Appellees contend, and we agree, that absent a transcript of the evidence presented at final hearing or a stipulated statement pursuant to Rule 3.6(b), F.A.R., error cannot be demonstrated.
Accordingly, affording the judgment appealed from the presumption of correctness, we affirm said judgment.
Affirmed.
CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Zeigler v. State, 402 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 1981)…ule that results of a polygraph examination are inadmissible, is equally applicable to the results of a sodium butathol test. See Sullivan v. State, 303 So. 2d 632 (Fla.1974); State v. Riggins, 348 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Crawford v. State, 321 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), approved in State v. Crawford, 339 So. 2d 214 (Fla.1976). Also the trial judge properly excluded the testimony of the psychiatrist, Dr. Zimmer. Defendant’s sanity was never an issue at trial. During the guilt phase of the trial…
-
Farmer v. City OF Fort Lauderdale, 427 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1983)…tipulation, either written or oral. On tangential issues, courts of this state have held that the mention at trial that a witness was asked to take a polygraph test raised an impermissible infer [*190] ence of witness credibility, Crawford v. State, 321 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), that no presumption adverse to an individual failing to submit to a test can be drawn, City of Miami v. Jervis, 139 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); that a jury can give exculpatory polygraph test evidence admitted upon stipulatio…
-
Hutchins v. State, 334 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…tion on his part and reversible error cannot be predicated on mere conjecture. See Sullivan v. State, Fla. 1974, 303 So. 2d 632. Thus, we find this point lacks merit. We also note that the recently released case of Crawford v. State, Fla.App. 1975, 321 So. 2d 559 is not controlling because in the instant case in contrast to Crawford (1) upon objections of defense counsel, curative instructions were given to the jury; (2) one of the two references to a polygraph examination was elicited by defense counsel dur…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence