STATE EX REL. YOUNG

v.

KELLY, SHERIFF

Citator

Cited By

• Hapney v. Cent. Garage, Inc., 579 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
  …the “legitimate business interests” of the employer. Perhaps most fundamental to our determination is that “[t]he right to work, earn a living and acquire and possess property from the fruits of one’s labor is an inalienable right.” Lee v. Delmar, 66 So. 2d 252, 255 (Fla.1953); Art. I, § 2, Fla. Const. Implicit in this right is the opportunity to move freely within the labor force in the quest for advancement in position and economic productivity. Certainly the common law of this state recognized and jealo…
• Stadnik v. Shell's City, Inc., 140 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1962)
  …f the same suit, in the same .county, to obtain the same result. The validity of Rule 2 must be measured by the established tests. It must bear a reasonable relationship to public safety, health, morals and general welfare. Lee v. Delmar, Fla.1953, 66 So. 2d 252; State ex rel. Hathaway v. Smith, 160 Fla. 485, 35 So. 2d 650. Florida Dry Cleaning, etc., Board v. Everglades Laundry, 137 Fla. 290, 188 So. 380; Gillett v. Florida University of Dermatology, 144 Fla. 236, 197 So. 852. The sole question here is whe…
• Harris v. Fla. Real Est. Comm'n, 358 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …res a finding that the person is guilty of disseminating false or misleading information for the purpose of inducing the sale of real estate in Florida. The statute is not authority for the action of the Commission in these cases. In Lee v. Delmar, 66 So. 2d 252 (Fla.1953), the Florida Real Estate Commission adopted a resolution which prohibited salesmen from operating on a part-time basis and, pursuant to that resolution, denied a salesman’s application for renewal of his registration. The Supreme Court ru…