JESSIE JORDAN, APPELLANT
v.
CITY OF TAMPA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
JESSIE JORDAN, APPELLANT
CITY OF TAMPA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
66 So. 2d 489
Florida Supreme Court (1953)
Caution
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of High v. City of Jacksonville, 51 Fla. 207, 40 So. 1032; Stallings v. City of Tampa, 78 Fla. 606, 83 So. 625; Crumbley v. City of Jacksonville, 102 Fla. 408, 135 So. 885-also 102 Fla. 408, 138 So. 486; Town of Miami Springs v. Lasseter, Fla., 60 So. 2d 774; Olivier v. City of St. Petersburg, Fla., 65 So. 2d 71.
ROBERTS, C. J., and-THOMAS and DREW, JJ., and HOLT, Associate Justice, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Grubstein v. Urban Renewal Agency OF City OF Tampa, 115 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1959)…previously selected private manufacturing concern. If any public purpose was involved it was a mere incident to the accomplishment of the private objective. The Adams case has been followed in two subsequent decisions. In Lewis v. Peters, Fla.1953, 66 So. 2d 489, we held that the Housing Authority of Panama City could not enter into an arrangement with private persons for the leasing of public land to he used in the construction of housing accommodations for naval personnel. This case in no respect involved…1 / 2
-
State of Fla. ex rel. Frank C. Gardner v. Sailboat KEY, Inc., 295 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…ng been made to appear, the order appealed from is affirmed. . Suit will lie to enjoin the commission of threatened action of a kind that would be subject to restraint. Zetrouer v. Zetrouer, 89 Fla. 253, 103 So. 625, 626; Lewis v. Peters, FIa.1953, 66 So. 2d 489, 492^93. . A different rule applies where one seeking to enjoin a public nuisance proceeds as an individual, and not in the name of the state under § 60.05 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. In that instance, for there to be standing to so proceed, it must be shown…
-
A1A Mobile Home Park, Inc. v. Brevard Cnty., 246 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)…r the location and the site selected alleged by plaintiff to be “needless and unwarranted” is supported by good and satisfactory evidence of the adequacy of the design so as to negate the probability of odor or noise.2 In Lewis v. Peters, Fla.1953, 66 So. 2d 489, 492, the Supreme Court, in discussing one of the functions of injunction, observed, in part, as follows: “One of the most valuable phases of injunctions is to prevent an injury from occurring and not to be forced to wait until after the damage is…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Crumbley v. City of Jacksonville, 102 Fla. 408 (Fla. 1931)
- Montverde Dev. Corp. v. Howey-in-the-Hills, 102 Fla. 233 (Fla. 1931)
- Town of Miami Springs v. Lasseter, 60 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 1952)
- Olivier v. City of ST. Petersburg, 65 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 1953)
- Stallings v. City of Tampa, 78 Fla. 606 (Fla. 1919)
- Green H. High v. The City of Jacksonville, 51 Fla. 207 (Fla. 1906)