JAMES M. MILLER
v.
CLARENCE G. TILDEN
JAMES M. MILLER
CLARENCE G. TILDEN
154 Fla. 44
Florida Supreme Court (1944)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 16 So. 2d 433
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The question raised in this case is concluded by our opinion and judgment on rehearing in Tison v. Hyer, et al., decided this date. The judgment appealed from is therefore reversed on authority of the last cited case.
Reversed.
BUFORD, C. J., CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
MR. and MRS. L. H. McCall v. Motor Fuel Carriers, Inc., 155 Fla. 854 (Fla. 1945)…ion must rest upon the legal effect of the evidence. The Commission’s award was based upon our decision in the cases of Moorer v. Putnam Lumber Co., 152 Fla. 520, 12 So. (2nd) 370; Williams Brothers Corporation, et al., v. Rufus McAmy Hicks, et al., 154 Fla. 44, 16 So. (2nd) 432. The gist of the evidence is that the father, 67 years of age, is too infirm to earn a living. The mother, past 60 years old, is without earnng power. The family consisted of father, mother and the 21 year old son, now deceased.…
-
Paul Spellman, Inc. v. Spellman, 103 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)…his life or not, and that on account of his health, it was doubtful whether he would continue to work for any great length of time. Respondents quote at length from the findings of the Deputy Commissioner in Williams Brothers Corp. v. Hicks, 1944, 154 Fla. 44, 16 So. 2d 432 (affirmed per curiam), wherein a mother, although mainly supported by her husband, was held to be a partial dependent of her deceased son who made occasional but irregular contributions towards his parents’ support. They also rely on…