BARRY HINNANT D/B/A BARRY'S CAR LOT, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),

v.

SHANNON MOTORS, INC., A CORPORATION, APPELLEE (PLAINTIFF)

Citator

Cited By

• Rivenbark v. Norine Deep Rivenbark, 335 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …ual encounter at the Gainesville apartment are hardly proof of “a continuing union of partners who intended to remain [in Gainesville] and to remain married, indefinitely if not permanently.” Carroll v. Carroll, 322 So. 2d at 57. Cf. Smith v. Smith, 322 So. 2d 580 (Fla.App.2d, 1975). This marriage was broken in Bainbridge, Georgia. There being no substantial competent evidence to support the wife’s contention and the trial court’s finding that the cause of action arose in Alachua County, the husband is entitl…
• Busot v. Florencio Otto Busot, 338 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
  …ts in Weeks showed such a reconciliation. The facts here do not. Obviously, reconciliation requires an intention of the parties to rec [*1335] oncile and this requires more than some occasional post-separation sexual experiences. Cf. Smith v. Smith, 322 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). We hold, therefore, the trial court erred in holding the agreement entered into between these parties was void and unenforceable in the State of Florida. Accordingly, we vacate the amended final judgment entered on December 17,…
• Pyle v. Pyle, 378 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …rt to provide for the best interests of the parties and their minor child while the husband continued to live in California. We find merit in appellant-wife’s contentions and reverse. See, Ryan v. Ryan, 277 So. 2d 266 (Fla.1978); Smith v. Smith, 322 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Riley v. Riley, 271 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972); and Sections 61.001 and 61.052, Florida Statutes (1971). Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.…