OLIVER EDWARDS, III, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE)

Citator

Cited By

• Ferris v. Turlington, 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987)
  …oted: “Until the court decision in Bowling v. Department of Insurance, 394 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), charges to support the revocation of a license had to be proven by clear and convincing evidence. Walker v. Florida State Board of Optometry, 322 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). In a proceeding brought to suspend or revoke a real estate license on charges of dishonest conduct, it was determined that the dishonesty must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. Reid v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 18…
• Ferris v. Austin, 487 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
  …65] 11. Until the court decision in Bowling v. Department of Insurance, 394 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), charges to support the revocation of a license had to be proven by clear and convincing evidence. Walker v. Florida State Board of Optometry, 322 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). In a proceeding brought to suspend or revoke a real estate license on charges of dishonest conduct, it was determined that the dishonesty must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. Reid v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 18…
• Albert Sneij, M.D. v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 454 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …somewhat shaky. No other witnesses testified at the hearing. Plainly, this evidence was woefully insufficient to establish any of the charges against Dr. Sneij, save for the record-keeping violations. See Walker v. Florida State Board of Optometry, 322 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Beyond that, the law is clear that the Board was not free to reject the hearing examiner’s findings when, as here, these findings were based on competent, substantial evidence. This being so, the Board had no authority, in any e…