LEON MOBLEY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Friends OF the Everglades, Inc. v. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs OF Monroe Cnty., 456 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …reserving also the rights of the landowner by “including a specific timetable compelling expeditious action in order to quickly resolve the question of governmental dictates as to the use of his land.” Sarasota County v. Beker Phosphate Corporation, 322 So. 2d 655, 658 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). See also Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So. 2d 1374, 1377 (Fla.1981) (competing interests of state and landowner must be balanced). In heeding the legislative purposes outlined above, one should remember that the d…
• Gen. Elec. Credit Corp. OF Ga. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 346 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …heard by the County Commission or the application for a development of regional impact which was considered by the Regional Planning Council. To support this contention, appellant has mistakenly relied upon Sarasota County v. Beker Phosphate Corp., 322 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), and Sarasota County v. General Development Corp., 325 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). In both cases, Sarasota County sought to directly appeal development orders to the Adjudicatory Commission without having the kind of interest p…
• Compass Lake Hills Dev. Corp. v. State, 379 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …ose of Chapter 380 is to protect the natural resources and environment of the State, preserve water resources, and facilitate orderly and well planned development. Section 380.021, Florida Statutes. In Sarasota County v. Beker Phosphate Corporation, 322 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), this court held: “The entire scheme of Chapter 380 carefully preserves the rights of local governments to the maximum extent possible in ‘zoning’ property within its boundaries; the rights of the regional area by requiring a re…

Authorities Cited

• Klenge M. Nelson, II v. State, 319 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)