THE CITIZENS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONERS,

v.

WILLIAM T. MAYO ET AL., AND SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• The Citizens OF the State of Fla. v. Mayo, 333 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1976)
  …h case the Court was asked, but declined, to treat the initial interim rate increase order as final. E. g., Citizens of Florida v. Mayo, (Florida Power Corp.,) 316 So. 2d 262 (Fla.1975); Citizens of Florida v. Mayo (Southern Bell Tele. & Tele. Co.), 322 So. 2d 911 (Fla.1975). . Oh. 74-195, § 4, Laws of Florida, now appearing as Section 366.06(4), Fla.Stat. (1975). . An amended notice was published on November 8, 1974, changing the first hearing date to December 11. . The office of public counsel, which was…
• Malt v. Deese, 399 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …can either claim under or against it, but he cannot do both, and having adopted one course with knowledge of the facts, he cannot afterwards pursue the other.” See also Gladding Corp. v. Register, 293 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. discharged 322 So. 2d 911 (Fla.1975); Tonkovich v. South Florida Citrus Industries, 202 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967). Even were we to disregard the existence of waiver, the record supports the trial court’s decision upon the issue of rescission. First, we fail to see how t…
• Esplanade Patio Homes Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Rolle, 613 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
  …he developer which, whether or not the developer’s representative occupied positions on the association’s board of directors, could not bind the association itself, see Gladding Corp. v. Register, 293 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. discharged, 322 So. 2d 911 (Fla.1975), and (b) the appellees could not therefore have reasonably relied upon those statements in erecting the dish after their purchase of the home. Since two of the elements indispensable to the creation of an estoppel, a statement by the part…

Authorities Cited

• Smith v. State, 316 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 1975)