JAMES WILSON ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jaffee v. Jaffee, 394 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …ld that the appellee did not carry the exceptionally heavy burden required to set aside an alimony allowance fixed by agreement. Floyd v. Floyd, 393 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Tsavaris v. Tsavaris, 307 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 322 So. 2d 914 (Fla.1975); Nixon v. Nixon, 200 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). Accordingly, the order of modification is vacated. After remand, the husband’s obligation to pay alimony shall be restored nunc pro tunc to that required by the terms of the agreement.…
• Tinsley v. Lowell Andrew Tinsley, 502 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
  …rties, the party who seeks a change carries a heavier than usual burden of proof. Floyd v. Floyd, 393 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Coe v. Coe, 352 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Tsavaris v. Tsavaris, 307 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 322 So. 2d 914 (Fla.1975); Howell v. Howell, 301 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). The husband has not carried his heavy burden in this case. Ordinarily, the purposes to which the spouse puts the alimony award generally do not support a modification of the award. Our…
• Andrews v. Andrews, 409 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)
  …agreement carries an exceptionally heavy burden. Jaffee v. Jaffee, 394 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Coe v. Coe, 352 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). As this court held in Tsavaris v. Tsavaris, [*1138] 307 So. 2d 845, 847 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 322 So. 2d 914 (Fla.1975), quoting from Scott v. Scott, 285 So. 2d 423 (Fla.2d DCA 1973): “ ‘Where the amount of alimony is based upon agreement a heavier burden rests upon a party seeking a modification than would otherwise be required.’ ” The wife here did not…