SPESSARD L. HOLLAND, GOVERNOR, ET AL., AS AND CONSTITUTING THE TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.,
v.
WILSON CYPRESS COMPANY, A CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court denied a petition for interlocutory certiorari, upholding lower court orders that restrained proceedings in a common law action and denied motions to strike and dismiss a bill of complaint.
The Florida Supreme Court held that the petition for interlocutory writ of certiorari should be denied, meaning the lower court's orders were not erroneous and would stand.
“This cause is before the Court on petition of the defendant below for an interlocutory writ of certiorari seeking to quash (a) an order of the lower court restraining proceedings in a certain common law action now pending in Putnam County Florida; (b) an order of the lower court denying a motion to strike described or designated portions of the bill of complaint; and (c) an order of the lower court denying a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint.”
This quote describes the procedural posture and the specific lower court orders being challenged by the petitioner.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe defendant in a lower court action petitioned for an interlocutory writ of certiorari. The petition sought to quash three orders: one restraining p…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Strike cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause is before the Court on petition of the defendant below for an interlocutory writ of certiorari seeking to quash (a) an order of the lower court restraining proceedings in a certain common law action now pending in Putnam County Florida; (b) an order of the lower court denying a motion to strike described or designated portions of the bill *114of complaint; and (c) an order of the lower court denying a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint. We have given careful consideration to the pleadings and briefs filed in the cause, and, after hearing able oral argument at the bar of this Court on the part of counsel for the respective parties, we have reached the conclusion that the petition should be and is hereby denied.
It is so ordered.
BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
TERRELL, J., not participating.