ADVISORY OPINION TO ACTING GOVERNOR JOHNS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court issued an advisory opinion to Acting Governor Charley E. Johns following Governor Dan McCarty's death, addressing whether warrants signed by the deceased governor but not yet delivered could be reissued and what signature form the acting governor should use. The court held that the acting governor could ratify the former governor's countersignatures by executive proclamation and could sign documents as 'Acting Governor.'
The acting governor may execute a proclamation adopting, confirming, and ratifying the former governor's countersignatures on warrants as his own, thereby authorizing their delivery and payment. When performing executive duties, the acting governor is authorized to designate himself as 'Acting Governor' in accordance with Section 19, Article IV of the Florida Constitution.
“you may make an executive proclamation adopting, confirming and ratifying said countersignatures aforementioned as your own, as Acting Governor under Section 19, Article IV, of the Constitution of Florida”
Establishes that the acting governor could ratify the deceased governor's signatures through executive proclamation
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGovernor Dan McCarty died on September 28, 1953, and pursuant to the Florida Constitution, the duties of Governor devolved upon Charley E. Johns, who …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Honorable Charley E. Johns
Acting Governor
Tallahassee, Florida
Sir:
We are in receipt of your request of September 29, 1953, for advisory opinion as follows:
“Honorable B. K. Roberts, Chief Justice, and The Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida
“Tallahassee, Florida
“Re: State Warrants heretofore prepared and signed by former Governor McCarty but not delivered; official signature of President of the Senate when duties of Governor devolve upon him.
“Gentlemen:
“It is my painful duty to advise you that His Excellency Governor Dan McCarty has died, and under the Constitution the duties of Governor devolve upon me as President of the Senate.
“Under Section 6, Article 4 of the State Constitution [F.S.A.] I am directed to take care that the laws of this state are faithfully executed and under Section 13 of Article 4, I am authorized to request the written opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Court as to the interpretation of any portion of the State Constitution about any question affecting my executive duties and powers. “Under Section 24 of Article 4 of the State Constitution, funds may be disbursed from the state treasury only upon the order of the Comptroller, countersigned by the Governor in such manner as shall be prescribed by law.
“Section 1, Article 4 of the State Constitution, provides that the supreme executive power of the state shall be vested in the chief magistrate who shall be styled the Governor of Florida.
“Prior to the death of Governor McCarty on September 28, 1953, many thousand state warrants, several thousand of them representing the payroll of state employees, were prepared and Governor McCarty’s signature placed thereon in the usual manner with his full knowledge and consent, which warrants have not yet been delivered. My problem is whether or not I should require the reissuance of all of said warrants bearing my signature or permit the delivery of the above mentioned warrants by the State Comptroller. “I therefore propound to you the following questions and request your advice or opinion concerning the same:
“1. May I under the powers and duties of Governor devolved upon me pursuant to Section 19 of Article 4, direct that the State Comptroller issue and deliver the above mentioned warrants to the payees named therein without my signature appearing thereon?
“2. If the above question is answered in the negative, then may I by executive order or proclamation approve and adopt the signature of Governor McCarty appearing thereon and direct the issuance and delivery of said state warrants to the payees therein named?
“3. In signing official documents and acts, should I sign the same as Governor, as Acting Governor, or in some other form? If in some other form, please advise me the form in which I should sign.
“Respectfully submitted,
“Charley E. Johns
“President of the Senate upon whom has devolved the duties of Governor by virtue of Section 19, Article 4 of the State Constitution”
In response to your questions one and two which, for convenience, are answered jointly, you are advised that as to those warrants prepared prior to the death of Governor Dan T. McCarty, but bearing date subsequent thereto and which have been heretofore signed by the Comptroller and countersigned in the usual manner “Dan McCarty, Governor", you may make an executive proclamation adopting, confirming and ratifying said countersignatures aforementioned as your own, as Acting Governor under Section 19, Article IV, of the Constitution of Florida; and upon your so proclaiming, you are advised that you are authorized to cause to be delivered such warrants to the payees thereof to be accepted and paid by the Treasurer of the State of Florida and the funds disbursed accordingly.
In response to your question three, you are advised that under Section 19, Article IV, of the Constitution of Florida, the powers and duties of Governor have devolved upon you by virtue of the death of Governor Dan T. McCarty and it is our opinion that, when performing such executive duties, you are authorized to designate yourself as Acting Governor, by virtue of Section 19, Article IV of the Constitution.
Respectfully submitted,
B. K. ROBERTS Chief Justice
GLENN TERRELL
ELWYN THOMAS
If. L. SEBRING
T. FRANK HOBSON
JOHN E. MATHEWS
E. HARRIS DREW
Justices.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State ex rel. Ayres v. Gray, 69 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1953)…ent of the Senate or the Speaker of the House of Representatives, but only the “powers and duties”. The fact that the President of the Senate became Acting Governor and not Governor was decided in our Advisory Opinion to Acting Governor Johns, Fla., 67 So. 2d 413, 414, wherein he asked the following question: “3. In signing official documents and acts, should I sign the same as Governor, as Acting Governor, or in some other form? If in some other form, please advise me the form in which I should sign.” and…
-
State ex rel. W. v. Gray, 74 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1954)…over [*124] nor of the State of Florida for the balance of - the unexpired term of the late Dan T. McCarty beginning on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January 1955. In re Advisory Opinion to Acting Governor Johns, Fla., Sept. 29, 1953, 67 So. 2d 413, we held that Senator Johns was Acting Governor of the State of Florida by reason of the death of the late Dan T. McCarty, and in the case of State ex rel. Ayres v. Gray, Fla., 1953, 69 So. 2d 187, we held that an election was required in November,…
-
State ex rel. W. v. Gray, 70 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1954)…gible to be elected Governor of the State of Florida for the balance of 'the unexpired term of the late Dan T. McCartyj beginning on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January, 1955. . In re Advisory Opinion to Acting Governor Johns, Fla., 67 So. 2d 413,. we held that Senator Johns was Acting Governor of the State of , Florida by reason, of the death of the late Dan T. McCarty, and in the case of State ex rel. Ayres v. Gray, Fla. 1953, 69 So. 2d 187, we held that an election was required in Novembe…