W. L. JUSTICE, APPELLANT,

v.

SCOTT M. LOFTIN AND JOHN W. MARTIN, AS TRUSTEES OF FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• KAY v. Key W. Dev. Co., 72 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 1954)
  …h relief to dissolve the corporation. Neither do we feel that intervention by a court of equity under the circumstances revealed by this record is in any way meddling with the internal affairs of corporate management. See Freedman v. Fox, Fla. 1953, 67 So. 2d 692. The question involved here is much more substantial and real. The Legislature by the passage of Chapter 28170, Laws of Florida, Act of 1953, added Chapter 608 to the Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and, in Section 608.28 thereof, recognized the necessit…
• Koren Kreedian v. BCK Land, Inc., 145 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
  …d justify a reversal of the chancellor’s findings and accordingly no good purpose would be accomplished by further elaboration. See Curtis v. Briscoe, Fla.App.1961, 129 So. 2d 450; Jones v. Harvey, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 371; Freedman v. Fox, Fla.1953, 67 So. 2d 692; 7 Fla.Jur., Corporations, § 356. No corporate mismanagement having been demonstrated and, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, we conclude that there was no sufficient evidence upon which the chan [*551] cellor could…
• Corlett v. Merritt, 478 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …heir judgment for that of the parties thereto and rewrite a contract in order to relieve one of the parties from the apparent hardship of an improvident bargain.”), or interfere with the internal affairs of corporate management, see Freedman v. Fox, 67 So. 2d 692 (Fla.1953). Compare Mann v. Price, 434 So. 2d 943 (Fla.2d DCA 1983). In the present case, there is no provision for redemption to be found anywhere — none in a statute, none in any corporate document, none in any agreement. The appellees argue, how…

  ← 1 / 2 →