CHARLES EDWARD HUESMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

WANDA LEA HALL HUESMAN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hancock v. Dep't OF Corr., 585 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …sues of fact exist and the slightest doubt remains, the summary [*1071] judgment must be reversed. If not, then the remaining question is whether the summary judgment was based on a proper application of the law. See Wesley Construction Co. v. Lane, 323 So. 2d 649, 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 336 So. 2d 1185 (Fla.1976); 49 Fla.Jur.2d Summary Judgment § 14 (1984). Hancock was injured while performing work assigned to him by the Department. As such, the duty owed by the Department to Hancock was akin…
• Taylor v. Maness, 941 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …ne issue of material fact is shown to exist, the only question for the appellate court is whether the summary judgment was properly granted under the law.” Yardum v. Scalese, 799 So. 2d 382, 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(citing Wesley Constr. Co. v. Lane, 323 So. 2d 649, 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)). Thus, “[a] trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary judgment regarding a pure question of law is reviewed de novo.” Fernandez v. Homestar at Miller Cove, Inc., 935 So. 2d 547, 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). The Taylors attemp…
• Peoples GAS Sys., Inc. v. Peoples First Nat'l Bank of N. Miami Beach, 556 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Wesley Construction Co. v. Lane, 323 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Vogel Bros. Building Co. v. Scarborough Constructors, Inc., 513 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987); Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Cheesbro Roofing, Inc., 502 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).…

Authorities Cited

• Bordman v. Bordman, 231 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)