JAMES T. FLEMING
v.
MAX B. JONES

Fla. | 1944-02-29
BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
154 Fla. 215 Florida Supreme Court (1944) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 17 So. 2d 123
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed.

It is so ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …its under the rule and statutes are essentially the same. [*145] In passing on the essential requirements for disqualification of a trial judge in a criminal case under § 911.01, Fla.Stat., F. S.A., the Supreme Court in State ex rel. Murray v. Caro, 154 Fla. 215, 17 So. 2d 79 at p. 81 (1944) made the following statement : “It is contemplated by the statute that before an order of disqualification will be entered by the trial judge the facts alleged in the accompanying affidavits required to be filed with t…
  • Miles B. Mank II v. Hendrickson, 195 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)
    …of the judge. State ex rel. Brown v. Dewell, 1938, 131 Fla. 566, 179 So. 695, 115 A.L.R. 857; State ex rel. La Russa v. Himes, 1940, 144 Fla. 145, 197 So. 762; Zarate v. Culbreath, 1942, 150 Fla. 543, 8 So. 2d 1; State ex rel. Murray v. Caro, 1944, 154 Fla. 215, 17 So. 2d 79. Using the mentioned statute, appellees applied to the appellant for a change of judge. Appellant ruled that, while appellees’ affidavits were statutorily sufficient to disqualify him for prejudice, the accompanying affidavits filed b…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw