JOHN CONRAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
JOHN CONRAN
STATE OF FLORIDA
154 Fla. 227
Florida Supreme Court (1944)
Caution
Also reported at: 17 So. 2d 82
Cited by 23 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of perjury and on appeal here he questions the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. .We have considered the evidence and are of the opinion that it is insufficient to sustain the verdict, hence the judgment is therefore reversed.
Reversed.
BUFORD, C. J., CHAPMAN, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Leonetti v. Boone, 74 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1954)…t the presumption in fact, and in those circumstances it is error to charge the jury that the presumption disappears only “when the railroad adduces substantial evidence that the employees were not negligent.” Powell v. American Sumatra Tobacco Co., 154 Fla. 227, 17 So. 2d 391, 392; Loftin v. Skelton, 152 Fla. 437, 12 So. 2d 175; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Voss, 136 Fla. 32, 186 So. 199; Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Bailey, 5 Cir., 190 F. 2d 812. Section 768.05, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A. Although the…
-
Channell v. State, 107 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)…of offenses and to the sufficiency of the verdicts. As to misjoinder of offenses, appellant asserts that the opinion of this court is in direct conflict with certain cases of the Florida Supreme Court, notably Houchins v. State, 1944, 154 Fla. 283, 17 So. 2d 82; Shargaa v. State, Fla.1958, 102 So. 2d 814; McGahagin v. State, 1880, 17 Fla. 665; and Meade v. State, Fla.1956, 85 So. 2d 613, 59 A.L.R.2d 835. It was the holding of this court that appellant’s objection to the alleged misjoinder of offenses, hav…1 / 3
-
Stovall v. State, 156 Fla. 832 (Fla. 1946)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence