LUKE ROBERTS, JR., PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Hunt v. First Nat'l Bank OF Tampa, 381 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
  …tent ambiguity, they are frequently called upon to determine what the parties would have included in their contract had they anticipated an occurrence which they in fact overlooked.3 Morton v. Morton, 307 So. 3d 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 324 So. 2d 90 (Fla.1975). In doing so, .the function of the court is to ascertain, insofar as possible, the intent of the parties. Bal Harbour Shops, Inc. v. Greenleaf & Crosby Co., 274 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). Extrinsic evidence is not only admissible on th…
• DePOORTER v. Win Edward DePOORTER, 509 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …ffield, 310 So. 2d at 413. An agreement which fails to make provision for unmarried cohabitation may be interpreted as precluding reduction or termination of alimony on that ground. See Greenwald v. Blume, 312 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 324 So. 2d 90 (Fla.1975). Furthermore, if the language of the agreement “indicates a clear intention by the parties that the agreed-upon provisions for alimony would be controlling, and that its terms would be modifiable only as authorized therein,” then the lang…
• Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …of consideration of all available, appropriate, parol or other extrinsic evidence in order to ascertain the true intent of the parties where the language of their agreement is ambiguous: Morton v. Morton, 307 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 324 So. 2d 90 (Fla.1975); Royal American Realty, Inc. v. Bank of Palm Beach and Trust Co., 215 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); see also Pickren v. United States, 378 F. 2d 595 (5th Cir.1967); Adler v. Nicholas, 381 F. 2d 168 (5th Cir.1967); Bal Harbour Shops, Inc…