THOMAS P. CAHILL, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM R. FRAZIER, ETC. ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1975-12-02
No. Z-50
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.
324 So. 2d 143 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal, having been considered, is dismissed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • ABC Liquors, Inc. v. City OF Ocala, 366 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
    …iquor businesses, absent arbitrary and discriminatory prohibitions in fact, was established by Permenter v. Younan, 159 Fla. 226, 31 So. 2d 387 (1947), and that this court properly adhered to that rule in Central Florida Distributing Co. v. Jackson, 324 So. 2d 143, 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975): Here, where the business engaged in is a privilege, rather than a right, it is not essential that a specific prescribed standard be expressly stated in the legislation. Permenter v. Younan, 159 Fla. 226, 31 So. 2d 387 (194…
    1 / 2
  • …ve reasonable notice of their intended price changes is satisfactorily related to the purposes of the Tied House Evil statute, and therefore that the requirement is among the Division s rulemaking powers. Central Florida Distributing Co. v. Jackson, 324 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). On this record we need not determine whether two or three days’ notice would achieve the same beneficial purposes as ten days’ notice, while loosening the restriction on wholesale pricing practices, and if so whether the greater…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw