ARTHUR H. SCHWAB, APPELLANT,
v.
ELSIE SCHWAB, APPELLEE
ARTHUR H. SCHWAB, APPELLANT,
ELSIE SCHWAB, APPELLEE
324 So. 2d 642
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Kleinfeld v. State, 270 So. 2d 22 (Fla.App.3rd, 1972); Zarate v. Culbreath, 150 Fla. 543, 8 So. 2d 1 (1942).
WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Hankins, 376 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 5th DCA 1979)…a felony, and in the absence of other evidence or circumstances bearing on the defendant’s intent, the best evidence of that intent is what he did steal. Platt v. State, 291 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974) (footnote omitted).” See also Mack v. State, 324 So. 2d 642, 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). The gravamen of the offense of burglary, whether of a conveyance or otherwise, is a nonconsensual entry with the intent to commit an offense within; the purpose of the statute is to punish an invasion of the possessory pro…
Authorities Cited
- Kleinfeld v. State, 270 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Zarate v. Culbreath, 150 Fla. 543 (Fla. 1942)