WESLEY JENNINGS MILLS, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE)

Citator

Cited By

• Murray v. State, 356 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …Appellant sought to interview one juror because during the polling of the jury, this juror began crying. This fact does not constitute a reasonable basis for belief that the verdict of the jury may be subject to a legal challenge. Bullard v. State, 324 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1 DCA 1975). Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by prohibiting appellant from interviewing this juror. Therefore, the judgment and sentence are AFFIRMED. MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.…
• Courtney v. State, 358 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …er, we hold that no reversible error resulted from this incident. See, e. g., Thomas v. State, 326 So. 2d 413 [*1109] (Fla.1975); Dunn v. State, 341 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Abbott v. State, 334 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Bullard v. State, 324 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Gray v. State, 310 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); and Wilcox v. State, 299 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Accordingly, appellant’s first point on appeal is without merit. Appellant, in his second point on appeal, attacks the pro…
• Aragon v. State, 853 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …difficult decision in a serious case and that she cried during the polling procedure. This is not misconduct by the juror and it does not form the basis of a reasQnable belief that the verdict may be subject to legal challenge. See Bullard v. State, 324 So. 2d 652, 654 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (indicating that in order to have a reason to believe that a verdict is subject to a legal challenge, there should be a “reason to believe that one or more of the jurors had violated their oath and disregarded the instructio…