W. H. BISHOP, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
ARTHUR SMITH, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
W. H. BISHOP, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
ARTHUR SMITH, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
102 Fla. 627
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 136 So. 318
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
— This cause having 'heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be give in the premises, it seems to the Court there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State of Fla. ex rel. THE Fla. BAR v. Ruskin, 126 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 1961)…Appeal, 316 Pa. 392, 175 A. 378. As early as 1930, we ourselves approved a similar judgment when a lawyer was suspended for a period of time and thereafter until he made restitution of certain misappropriated funds. Stalnaker v. State, 102 Fla. 638, 136 So. 318; In re Petition of Stalnaker, 150 Fla. 853, 9 So. 2d 100; See also, State ex rel. The Florida Bar v. Rhynard, Fla.1959, 116 So. 2d 417; State ex rel. The Florida Bar v. Brown, Fla.1959, 111 So. 2d 668. In prescribing the judgment hereafter announce…
-
In re Petition of Leo Stalnaker for Reinstatement as Attorney at Law, 150 Fla. 853 (Fla. 1942)…y paid off, satisfied and discharged the indebtedness of $9,018.49 due by him to the guardian of Florine Brandon, a minor. On appeal to this Court the aforesaid order of suspension of Leo Stalnaker was affirmed. See Stalnaker v. State, 102 Fla. 638, 136 So. 318. On December 2, 1941, Leo Stalnaker, by petition filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Hills-borough County, Florida, applied for an order of reinstatement under the several provisions of Rule C, Section 8, adopted by this Court on January 2…
-
Amos v. Burwell & Sibley, 106 Fla. 550 (Fla. 1932)…and another order refusing to discharge him were affirmed by us, thereby conclusively establishing the propriety and legality of the initial equity suit concerning which the fees involved were claimed and allowed. See City Trust Co. vs. Will Allen, 136 Sou. Rep. 318.…