MCMULLEN
v.
MCMULLEN
MCMULLEN
MCMULLEN
68 So. 2d 179
Florida Supreme Court (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We-are convinced that there was no evidence to warrant a final decree of divorce and that notwithstanding the lack of exceptions to the master’s report the chancellor should have dismissed the cross bill as well as the bill. See Lyon v. Lyon, Fla., 54 So. 2d 679.
The decree is reversed with directions to dismiss the cause.
THOMAS, SEBRING, HOBSON, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, J., dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
ACE Delivery Serv., Inc. v. Boyd, 100 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1958)…the responsibility of the Judge is to examine the evidence and determine whether under the law and facts the Court is justified in entering the decree recommended by the master. Lyon v. Lyon, Fla.1951, 54 So. 2d 679; McMullen v. McMullen, Fla.1953, 68 So. 2d 179. We have been referred to nothing in the Rules of the respondent Commission or the statutes applicable to procedures before the Commission which limits the Commission to a consideration of exceptions only at final hearing after a matter has been re…
-
Woolfson v. Alynn Rose, 448 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…o examine and carefully consider the evidence and determine whether under the law and the facts the court is justified in entering the decree recommended by the Master.’ ”) (quoting Lyon v. Lyon, 54 So. 2d 679, 680 (Fla.1951)); McMullen v. McMullen, 68 So. 2d 179 (Fla. [*1178] 1953) (reversing because of insufficient evidence the court’s entry of final decree of divorce, notwithstanding lack of exceptions to master’s report recommending entry of decree); Bell v. Bell, 307 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). See a…
Authorities Cited
- Lyon v. Lyon, 54 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 1951)