EUGENE BLACKNELL, APPELLANT,

v.

BARNES DETECTIVE AGENCY'S AUTO RECOVERY BUREAU, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1975-12-23

No. 75-757

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

325 So. 2d 72 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1975) Positive Treatment

Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Lynch v. State, 1934, 114 Fla. 839, 155 So. 99.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Hilsenroth v. Kessler, 353 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)

…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Kessler v. Hilsenroth, 325 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1975); Owens v. Smith, 154 So. 2d 878, 882 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).…
Hilsenroth v. Kessler, 446 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)

…his engineers. One month later, he sought a declaratory decree (the 1973 suit) concerning his right to a moratorium in principal and interest under the terms of the second mortgage. Hilsenroth prevailed at trial and on appeal. Kessler v. Hilsenroth, 325 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). At a hearing in this case on June 20, 1974, Hilsenroth [*149] first learned from Kessler’s testimony that Kessler had known of the moratorium prior to closing. At the end of 1975, Hilsenroth. filed suit to rescind the contract t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw