HENRY P. GILMORE, APPELLANT (PLAINTIFF),
v.
BARNEY BURKS ET AL., APPELLEE (DEFENDANT)

Fla. 1st DCA | 1976-01-21
No. Y-177
BOYER, C. J., MILLS, J., and CAW-THON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, ■ concur.
325 So. 2d 455 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, the record, and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Unused annual leave payments should not be considered compensation in computing pension benefits under the provisions of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of the City of Pensacola, Florida, and under the facts presented by the record in this case.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

BOYER, C. J., MILLS, J., and CAW-THON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Quick v. Quick, 400 So. 2d 1297 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
    …er the question of permanent periodic alimony during or at the end of the [*1300] appellant’s period of economic rehabilitation. Compare Stickney v. Stickney, 377 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. den., 386 So. 2d 642 (Fla.1980), Hayes v. Hayes, 325 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), and Hyatt v. Hyatt, 315 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), with Kelly v. Kelly, 361 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), and Cantor v. Cantor, 306 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). The chancellor has retained that power and, if and when the…
  • Lockwood v. Lockwood, 354 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
    …r the purpose of awarding permanent alimony. Further, this opinion is in keeping with the policy of Section 61.08 which is to do equity and justice between the parties. See generally Evans v. Evans, 337 So. 2d 998 (Fla.4th DCA 1976); Hayes v. Hayes, 325 So. 2d 455 (Fla.1st DCA 1976); Hyatt v. Hyatt, 315 So. 2d 11 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Sisson v. Sisson, 311 So. 2d 799 (Fla.1st DCA 1975); Lee v. Lee, 309 So. 2d 26 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); and Reback v. Reback, 296 So. 2d 541 (Fla.3d DCA 1974). For the reasons set forth…
  • …the system.” Cleary, 75 So. 2d at 795. Although the supreme court did not directly address the issue before us, it approved the [*230] trial court’s reasoning. The first district court of appeal has reached a similar conclusion in Gilmore v. Burks, 325 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). The approach urged by MBPF would lead to inequality among pension plan members, some of whom are unable to accumulate benefits. Pension acts are construed to avoid “an inequitable result or result in favoring one member over a…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw