CONRAD LEWIS THOMPSON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Bedford Computer Corp. v. Graphic Press, Inc., 484 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 1986)
  …an, 142 Fla. 14, 194 So. 282 (1940). The courts of this state have followed this rule in the context of contract disputes such as the one here. Gaskill v. May Brothers, Inc., 372 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Shannon v. Great Southern Equipment Co., 326 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Ressler v. Sena, 307 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Clark v. Realty Investment Center, Inc., 252 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). The fact that the defendant received actual notice of this lawsuit does not render the service of p…
• Lahr v. Lahr, 337 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
  …otice element of due process the complaint must set forth that the action is directed against the property itself and include a specific description of that property. Griffin, supra. See also Shannon v. Great Southern Equipment Co., Fla.App.2d 1976, 326 So. 2d 19. In the case before us the petition simply alleged that “[t]he parties own real and personal property to be distributed by this Court” and prayed “[t]hat this Court award the properties to Husband.” The said allegations do not satisfy the requiremen…
• Gaskill v. MAY Bros., Inc., 372 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
  …s simple actions ex contractu. Ressler v. Sena, 307 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Finally, the complaint was not sufficient to establish quasi in rem jurisdiction directed against appellant’s property. Shannon v. Great Southern Equipment Company, 326 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). The complaint did not seek to seize appellant’s property in order to satisfy appellee’s claim. In fact, the first mention of appellant’s property in the entire record occurred when the appellant moved to stay execution on the jud…

Authorities Cited

• Haiflich v. State, 285 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)