OSCAR LEE MCHOME, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE)

Fla. 1st DCA | 1976-01-30
No. Y-288
BOYER, C. J., and MILLS and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.
326 So. 2d 24 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1976) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs and record, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

BOYER, C. J., and MILLS and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …be that the City of Sunrise would be estopped from enforcing the lower density provision in the above set out ordinance because of the letter from the Mayor and the subsequent attempt to define the ordinance. But as was said in Westerlind v. Dehon, 326 So. 2d 24 (Fla.4th DCA 1976). “A purchaser can not be made to accept the property when he may have to [*688] litigate to obtain that property in the condition for which he contracted.” The question as to whether or not the City of Sunrise could enforce its…
  • Hauben v. Harmon, 605 F.2d 920 (5th Cir. 1979)
    …hat the pendency of condemnation proceedings at the time of execution of a contract constitutes a defect in title and is grounds for rescission of the contract. Walton Land & Timber Co. v. Long, 135 Fla. 843, 185 So. 839 (1939); Westerlind v. Dehon, 326 So. 2d 24 (Fla.App.1976). As the district judge explained in his opinion, these cases do not apply to the facts of the instant case because in each of them the condemnation action was filed before the execution of the contract. After finding that there had b…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw