TOLEY ENGEBRETSEN

v.

BESSIE MAE ENGEBRETSEN

Citator

Cited By (47 total)

• US Cas. Co. v. Md. Cas. Co., 55 So.2d 741 (Fla. 1951)
  …0 So. 675. Such fact does not destroy the reasons for the rule. However, as we have frequently held, the ruling of the full Commission does not reach the Circuit Court with a presumption of correctness, Florida Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So. 2d 251, as is true when "a case" is before this Court on appeal, but the Commission's judgment upon review of the Deputy Commissioner's findings and award should be tested by the Circuit Court in the manner hereinafter outlined when it is cl…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Rucker v. City OF Ocala & Crawford & Co., 684 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …ense that the worker’s compensation system replaced other rights formerly afforded to workers, we cannot agree with the district court that worker’s compensation is entirely in the nature of a privilege.”); Florida Forest & Park Serv. v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So. 2d 251, 254 (1944) (“A right to compen [*841] sation having accrued, at least potentially, by the happening of the injury, and the compensation claimant having proceeded by a judicially approved statutory course of procedure to enforce the c…
• Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Bedingfield, 60 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1952)
  …S.A.; Chamberlain v. Florida Power Corporation, 144 Fla. 719, 198 So. 486; Hardware Mutual Casualty Company v. Carlton, 151 Fla. 238, 9 So. 2d 359; Stansell v. Marlin, 153 Fla. 421, 14 So. 2d 892; and Florida Forestry and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So. 2d 251. The 1951 amendment to Section 440.39 F.S.A. made drastic changes. It abolished the election requirement, and provides that an injured employee may claim workmen's compensation benefits and at the same time institute suit against a t…