STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
THE CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
69 So. 2d 658
Florida Supreme Court (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Justice.
The record and briefs in this cause have been carefully examined by the Court and it appears that all questions raised by the assignments of error by all the parties have heretofore been determined by this Court. No good purpose would be served 'by writing an 'opinion reiterating and re affirming our former opinions. It is sufficient to say that each and every assignment of error has ¡been carefully considered and each of them is without merit.
Affirmed.
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Dade Cnty., 142 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1962)…company, association or corporation, or to obtain or appropriate money for, or to loan its credit to, any corporation, association, institution or individual.” . Brautigam v. White, Fla.1953, 64 So. 2d 781; State v. City of Daytona Beach, Fla.1954, 69 So. 2d 658; State v. City of Key West, 153 Fla. 226, 14 So. 2d 707. . City of Springfield v. Monday, 1945, 353 Mo. 981, 185 S.W. 2d 788; People ex rel. Murphy v. Kelly, 76 N.Y. 475; Long v. Mayo, 271 Ky. 192, 111 S.W. 2d 633; Cawood v. Coleman, 294 Ky. 858, 1…