WILLIAM THIEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendant's mere presence in a car where contraband was found was insufficient to sustain a conviction for constructive possession without evidence of knowledge and ability to control the contraband.
Appellant was a passenger in a car stopped by police, during which marijuana was found under the dashboard. The record was unclear as to whether the a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Felony Possession Of Marijuana cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was charged with felony possession of marijuana. After a jury trial he was found guilty and sentenced to fourteen months imprisonment.
Appellant was a passenger in a car stopped as it left a construction site around 11:30 p.m. The occupants of the car were assembled at the rear of the car for identification. Sergeant Oscar Perez of the Manatee County Sheriff’s Department approached the car and detected the odor of marijuana in the car. He shined his flashlight in the car and saw a baggie of what proved to be marijuana under the dashboard on the transmission hump. On the floor was a package of cigarette papers. There were ashes in the ashtray, but these were not analyzed. No smoke and no “roaches” were in the car. Appellant was tried jointly with the driver and the owner of the car. At the close of the state’s case a directed verdict of acquittal was entered as to the owner of the car. The state conceded in oral argument before this court that the record is unclear as to whether appellant was in the front seat of the car where the contraband was found and seized. We cannot ascertain whether appellant had the requisite knowledge of the contraband and the ability to control it or reduce it to his personal dominion that is necessary for a conviction of constructive possession. Spataro v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1965, 179 So. 2d 873. Under the specific factual situation of this case, appellant’s mere presence in the car with the marijuana was insufficient to sustain a conviction. See Taylor v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1975, 319 So. 2d 114.
Reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court to enter its order discharging appellant.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. State, 412 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)…976). House owned by defendant in which others rented rooms. Marijuana discovered in unspecified location; Townsend v. State, 330 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Contraband in automobile held not in exclusive possession of passenger; Thiel v. State, 326 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Marijuana found under dashboard of automobile in which defendant was passenger; Moore v. State, 325 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Controlled substance and paraphernalia found in an automobile jointly occupied by defendant and…
Authorities Cited
- Spataro v. State, 179 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Cent. & S. Fla. Flood Control Dist. v. Deadwyler, 319 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Odessa D. Taylor v. State, 319 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)