UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
PAUL LEROY BAKER AND NAOMI C. BAKER, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1976-02-25
No. AA-168
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.
327 So. 2d 110 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the record, briefs, and oral arguments of counsel, and finding that the interlocutory appeal is without substantial merit, it is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4.2, subd. c, Florida Appellate Rules.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pony Express Courier Corp. of Fla. v. Zimmer, 475 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
    …t District in Baxter’s Asphalt & Concrete, Inc. v. Liberty County, 406 So. 2d 461, 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), vacated on other grounds, 421 So. 2d 505, (Fla.1982), and in Florida National Bank at Gainesville v. Alfred & Ann Goldstein Foundation, Inc., 327 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). The Fourth District in Glusman v. Lieberman, 285 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), prior to the First and Third District’s expression of the concept, acknowledged that the recovery of attorney’s fees may be appropriate beyond the…
  • …PER CURIAM. Presented here is the identical issue posed in the Florida National Bank at Gainesville v. Alfred and Ann Goldstein Foundation, Inc., Fla.App., 327 So. 2d 110, opinion filed February 10, 1976. Upon the authority of Florida National Bank at Gainesville v. Goldstein Foundation, Inc., that portion of the summary final judgment here appealed by which attorney’s fees were fixed and awarded to appellee is rever…
  • Perkins State Bank v. Connolly, 632 F.2d 1306 (5th Cir. 1980)
    …Florida court which has interpreted a provision in the Uniform Commercial Code which arguably allows for awards of attorney’s fees has applied this strict approach. In Florida National Bank at Gainesville v. Alfred & Ann Goldstein Foundation, Inc., 327 So. 2d 110 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.-1st Dist. 1976), the court held that Fla.Stat. § 675.5-115 (remedy for improper dishonor or anticipatory repudiation) did not allow for attorney’s fees, either as costs or as damages; this conclusion was reached in spite of that se…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw