ROBERT E. JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1976-02-25
No. 74-1362
McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
327 So. 2d 250 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This case at first gave us pause. We now conclude after careful consideration the trial judge was eminently correct in directing a verdict in favor of appellee Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company.

Affirmed.

McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Arlington Towers Condo. N., Inc. v. Allington Towers N., Inc., 415 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
    …create an issue of material fact as to the existence of malice which could defeat the qualified privilege of a rival claimant to the property. This factual dispute cannot be resolved on summary judgment. Crabtree v. Rogers, supra; Bruce v. Turnbull, 327 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). See also Annot., 129 A.L.R. 179 (1940); Annot., 30 A.L.R.2d 840 (1955). We, therefore, reverse the partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw