R. H. STOUT, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
C. W. COBB, ET AL., APPELLEES
R. H. STOUT, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
C. W. COBB, ET AL., APPELLEES
102 Fla. 639
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 136 So. 319
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order and decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order 'and decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order and decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dunscombe v. Smith, 127 Fla. 797 (Fla. 1937)…the moneys from the collections of the securities held by the bank subject to call of Stuart Bank & Trust The law involved in this case applicable to such a trust fund is stated in the opinion in the case of Campbell, et al., v. Vining, as Receiver, 102 Fla. 639, 133 Sou. 555, where we held: “The words ‘The State Comptroller may forthwith and appoint a receiver to take charge of the assets and affairs of such bank’ imply and mean that the receiver in his representative capacity takes title to the assets an…